Conflicting strategies of argumentation in social networks
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Dynamics of Conflicting Beliefs in Social Networks
This paper analyzes two proposed models for simulating opinion dynamics in social networks where beliefs might be considered to be competing. In both models agents have a degree of tolerance, which represents the extent to which the agent takes into account the differing beliefs of other agents, and a degree of conflict, which represents the extent to which two beliefs are considered to be comp...
متن کاملDynamics of Multidimensional Conflicting Opinions in Social Networks
This paper proposes two models for simulating belief update in social networks in cases where certain beliefs might be considered to be competing. The proposed models represent different attitudes of people towards the perceived conflict between beliefs. Computer simulations show that the first model usually divides the community into several distinct groups with one of the beliefs being reject...
متن کاملfaculty of psychology and social sciences group of anthropology master thesis in major of anthropology
چکیده پایان نامه (شامل خلاصه، اهداف، روش های اجرا و نتایج به دست آمده): کار جمع آوری گو یش های محلی در سال های اخیر شتاب امیدوار کننده ای به خود گرفته است. شاید از بارزترین اهداف جمع آوری گویش های مختلف، ثبت و ضبط آن، جلوگیری از نابودی و مهمتر از همه حل مشکلات دستوری زبان رسمی باشد. دقت در فرآیند های زبانی گویش های محلی نوع ارتباط مردم نواحی مختلف با پیرامون نشان را به ما نشان خواهد داد. از س...
Applying Argumentation to Enhance Dialogues in Social Networks
Nowadays, many websites allow social networking between their users in an explicit or implicit way. In this work, we show how argumentation schemes theory can provide a valuable help to formalize and structure on-line discussions and user opinions in decision support and business oriented websites that held social networks among their users. Two real case studies are presented and analysed. The...
متن کاملArgumentation and Belief Updating in Social Networks: A Bayesian Model
Human rationality involves arguing for one’s beliefs as well as revising those beliefs in the face of good reasons to do so. An important problem in computer science and philosophical logic is to find models that combine argumentation and belief updating in one formal framework. In this article, we present the Laputa model which attempts to do precisely this. Laputa differs from some other fram...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Dialog: media studios
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2308-3255
DOI: 10.18524/2308-3255.2019.25.195594